Consumer Information

Author: Adrian Goslett
Regional Director and CEO of RE/MAX of Southern Africa
19 January 2021


At the end of the financial year, Homeowners Associations (HOA) and Body Corporates may choose to discuss and to implement annual levy escalations.

Should homeowners feel as though the proposed escalation is unreasonable, they may raise their objections to these escalations at the next Annual General Meeting says Adrian Goslett, Regional Director and CEO of RE/MAX of Southern Africa.

For those who wish to negotiate the levy increase, he suggests having all relevant facts together to make a more compelling argument.

“The best way to negotiate a lower escalation is to review the HOA’s financial statements to make sure that the proposed escalation aligns with the parameters laid out in the Sectional Titles Schemes Management Act (STSMA), Act no 8 of 2011,” he recommends.

According to the STSMA, one of the cases in which a body corporate is not obliged to increase levies is if the body corporate’s reserve fund at the end of the financial year is equal to or more than the levy income generated during the year.

If, however, the reserve fund of the HOA at the end of the financial year is less than 25% of the levy income generated during that year, the body corporate must make provisions so that they can provide for a reserve amount equal to 15% of the levy income for the new financial year. In other words, levies can be increased by 15% to supplement the reserve fund if it is below 25% of the total levy income.

When the reserve is between 25% – 99% of the levy income in that year, the body corporate should only make provision for a reserve amount equal to the repairs and maintenance items provided for in the new budget. In other words, they can increase levies by enough to cover the required repairs and maintenance to the common property that has been budgeted for within that financial year.

If, after doing these calculations, homeowners find that their body corporate or HOA is proposing escalations that fall beyond these requirements, then Goslett says that they have a convincing case for arguing against the proposed levy increase.

“Another tactic homeowners might try is to find out what similar complexes in neighbouring suburbs are charging on their levies. A local real estate agent can prove helpful in providing this information. If the proposed levy escalation will make the levies in your complex higher than the levies charged by comparable complexes, you can argue that it is in the greater interest of marketability and overall property values within your estate to keep levies as competitive as possible and the levy increase should therefore be reconsidered,” he recommends.

Ultimately, levy increases are meant to be in the best interest of all who own property within the complex or estate. If ever homeowners are in doubt about the proposed levy increase, they may request that the Body Corporate provide a justification for their decision.

“Homeowners should also feel free to speak to their local real estate advisor who can help them better understand whether their levies are fair,” Goslett concludes.

The original article can be viewed here: