AA - 2020

Author: Martin Bey
27 October 2020


Living together (also known as cohabitation) as husband and wife without concluding a civil marriage, whether as a conscious or unconscious choice, occurs in the vast majority of instances without appreciating the consequences.

Take, for example, the facts in Bwanya v Master of the High Court, Cape Town and Others in the judgment handed down on 1 October 2020. B and R met in 2014 and shortly afterwards moved in together. R always treated B as his wife and to friends, their relationship at all times appeared to be that of a loving couple. R died unexpectedly in April 2016, before plans to negotiate lobola and celebrate a wedding had materialised.

B lodged claims against R’s estate, in her capacity as R’s spouse and intestate heir. The executor and Master, however, rejected the claims as B was not R’s (marital) “spouse”, as the law requires for such a claim.

In a successful application by our Cape Town litigation team, headed by Martin Bey, it was successfully argued that heterosexual partners in a permanent relationship should, for purposes of the Intestate Succession Act (“ISA”), be regarded as “spouses” and hence entitled to benefit as intestate heirs. (Our courts have before found that partners in a permanent same-sex relationship should be regarded as “spouses” for purposes of ISA.)

Mr Bey is also spearheading the related claim on behalf of B for maintenance pending the finalisation of the estate in her capacity as permanent (but unmarried) life partner.

For assistance to resolve legal disputes, contact our Litigation Team at info@stbb.co.za.

The original article can be viewed here: